Hoboken's rent control changes will be held up

Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Ray Smith
Hudson Reporter

HOBOKEN – Just like many times in the past 37 years, Hoboken's
tenant advocates have succeeded in suspending recent changes by the City
Council to the city's Rent Control Ordinance.

Three changes to the ordinance were passed unanimously by the City Council in on March 2, but will now have to wait.

After
the council vote, rent control advocates took to the streets and
gathered 1,442 signatures to suspend Ordinance Z-88, which includes the
three amendments.

The amendments limit tenant reimbursement for
illegal rent overcharges to two years and make it easier for landlords
to provide documentation for seeking a vacancy decontrol. Landlords are
also required to distribute a pamphlet outlining tenant’s rights and
obtain signatures confirming delivery whenever a change in rent or
tenancy occurs.

Tenant advocates claim that the changes weaken
Hoboken’s rent control law and harm tenants, while Council President
Beth Mason, the chair of the subcommittee, stated that the council
believes the changes went “down the middle.”

Now, the ordinance will be suspended until it comes up for a public referendum, or until the City Council withdraws it.

“If
the City Clerk certifies the referendum petition as having a sufficient
number of signatures from registered voters in Hoboken, the City
Council must vote to either repeal the law or place it on the ballot for
a democratic vote,” according to a release from tenant advocates.

The clerk’s office was unable to confirm on Wednesday if the issue would appear on the ballot.

In
related news, tenant advocate and attorney Cathy Cardillo filed an
“order to show cause” in Hudson County Superior Court on Monday, naming
the City Council, Mayor Dawn Zimmer, and the city of Hoboken as
defendants. Cardillo’s filing states that the council members, because
they could be affected by the law financially, had a conflict of
interest in the vote. The lawsuit also states that the defendants
violated the Faulkner Act by enacting similar provisions, such as the
limitation of tenant rebates, to those that were defeated by a
referendum in 2005. 

FAIR
USE NOTICE. Tenants Together is not the author of this article and the posting
of this document does not imply any endorsement of the content by Tenants
Together.  This document may contain copyrighted material the use of which
may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Tenants
Together is making this article available on our website in an effort to
advance the understanding of tenant rights issues in California. We believe
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Help build power for renters' rights: