CALPERS corruption: A plan to make New Yorkers homeless

Thursday, October 15, 2009
Jill Stewart
LA Weekly

California taxpayers unknowingly handed a cool $50 million to braggart
Al Villalobos, and now the inept leaders of the California Public
Employee Retirement System are arguing that they encouraged this
possible pay-to-play debacle because they needed Al Villalobos to
suggest places for Calpers to invest its vast portfolio of public
money.

Christ almighty, people. Calpers has an ENTIRE STAFF paid solely to find places for Calpers to invest its vast wealth.

Too
bad Calpers is so obscure to most of the public. It's obscurity is what
allowed the arrogant Calpers board of directors to blow $50 million on
a notorious blowhard middleman like Villalobos, who -- get this -- is a
former member of Calpers' board of directors. In the early 1990s,
Villalobos was an L.A. deputy mayor under Richard Riordan. He was
impossible to take seriously in that minor job. Now he's a
gazillionaire. Makes sense to me!

Here's the other ugly news
breaking today about corruption at Calpers: its board of directors
poured vast public funds -- your money -- into a scheme in Manhattan to
force working-class people out of thousands of apartments on the city's
East Side, and rent those apartments to the rich. Sick, sick stuff.

Calpers' board of directors and staff need a massive political and fiscal enema. Here's what these people have been up to: 

According to the Wall Street Journal, CALPERS was a very, very
big investor in a plan to convert 11,000 apartments that make up the
vast "Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town" of 56 (yes, 56) brick
high-rises on the city's East Side. Apparently, these 56 towers provide
roofs for about 30,000 working-class New Yorkers.

In a plot
thick with evil intent -- like forced homelessness and mass evictions
-- Calpers poured in cash, along with the Government of Singapore
Investment Corp. and others, to own a piece of Cooper Village/Stuy
Town, which was built for returning veterans and their young families
after World War II.

Calpers' hope -- it's actual hope -- was to force out thousands of working-class residents, and turn the vast brick complex into "market rate" units.

The term "market rate" in Manhattan means housing for the upper-middle-class and the rich.

Add some granite counters, WiFi, poodle doors and snobby doormen, and
force thousands of working people out of their rent-controlled homes.
But do it 3,000 miles away from California in New York City.

We California state taxpayers paid for this nasty scheme, but we never knew it.

But
now, with Calpers mired in intellectual corruption -- and possibly
fiscal corruption, thanks to its pals like Al Villalobos -- the WSJ
reports that the vast brick Manhattan complex worth $5.4 billion when
Calpers bought into it is now worth $2.1 billion and default appears
"imminent."

Let's see it blow up in Calpers' face. California
voters are not shitheads. California voters have approved bond measure
after bond measure to provide affordable housing and house the
homeless. California voters would never, ever have backed such an
anti-human, anti-family, anti-worker scheme as the one Calpers invested
in in New York.

Maybe Californians will put an initiative on
the ballot to upend the Calpers board of directors and outlaw its
ultra-rich  private middlemen, and start over at this troubled pension
fund.

As the WSJ reported about Cooper Village/Stuy Town:
"The new owners predicted they would be able to convert thousands of
protected apartments to higher market rents. These projections
convinced Calpers" to jump in. How despicable.

FAIR
USE NOTICE. This document may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
Tenants Together is making this article available on our website in an
effort to advance the understanding of tenant rights issues in
California. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.
Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for
purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner. 

Help build power for renters' rights: