Analysis: Foreclosure "mess" unfolds state by state

(Reuters) - An
outcry over questionable foreclosures by GMAC Mortgage and other
lenders is likely to hit some states more than others because of major
differences in real estate law across the nation.

But ramifications for federal
taxpayers and investors will depend on the costs of clearing up the
problem, the latest fallout from the bursting of the U.S. real estate

GMAC Mortgage announced
last week that it had suspended evictions and post-foreclosure closings
in 23 states due to concerns over paperwork. In order for a lender to
foreclose on a property, it must prove that it actually checked the
borrower's loan agreements, and that the homeowner defaulted.

the unit of Ally Financial, which is 56.3 percent owned by the U.S.
government after a $17 billion bailout, said employees preparing
foreclosures had submitted affidavits to judges containing information
they did not personally verify.

a real mess," said Justice Arthur Schack, a jurist on foreclosure
issues who sits on the New York State Supreme Court in Brooklyn.

announcement has raised doubts about whether some people lost their
homes without good reason. Attorneys general in several states,
including California, Colorado, Illinois and Ohio, are investigating.

"The law demands that lenders prove their case in foreclosure actions," Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said last week.

But Ally characterizes the problem as merely technical, arguing that the underlying facts in each foreclosure are accurate.

are confident that the processing errors did not result in any
inappropriate foreclosures," it said in a statement last week.

landed in its predicament after one of its employees testified in a
December 2009 deposition that he signed off on tens of thousands of
affidavits containing information he did not verify.

company said it has "substantially increased" the number of employees
to verify documents, provided additional training, and suspended
evictions out of an "abundance of caution."

Ally isn't the only firm under the microscope.

Chase & Co is delaying its current foreclosure proceedings and has
begun to systematically re-examine related documents after discovering
that some employees may have signed affidavits in some cases without
personally reviewing the files.

in Florida are questioning JPMorgan's practices after discovering one
of its executives did not check the details of its claims against a

The executive said she had been part of an eight-person team that signs 18,000 documents a month.

Paul Miller, an analyst at FBR Capital
Markets, said he didn't think the foreclosure problems were material
enough to impact the timing of any initial public offering that Ally
has said it was considering.

Ally spokeswoman Gina Proia said the company does not anticipate a "significant adverse affect" related to the document issues.

last week Moody's said it may cut some GMAC ratings because case
resolutions could take longer than expected, which could mean higher
costs for borrowing by Ally.

And Miller said he expects more damaging disclosures across the industry.

"This will have big time legal ramifications throughout the foreclosure market," he said.


across the country have been skeptical about homeowner challenges based
on arguments that loans were improperly securitized, said O. Max
Gardner III, a bankruptcy lawyer in North Carolina.

But evidence of false affidavits might hit closer to home for judges, Gardner said.

you're talking about somebody submitting just a false document to the
court, knowing it was false, that is something that any judge can
understand," Gardner said.

However, states regulate foreclosures in very different ways.

some, like New York, judges sign off on foreclosure orders. That gives
homeowners an automatic courtroom session to air any complaints, making
it easier for document problems to gum up foreclosure proceedings.

But other states hard hit by the housing market
collapse, such as California, require homeowners to initiate their own
separate legal proceeding to raise problems with their documents, an
extra hoop which could dampen the impact of problems.

California this has been a huge uphill fight," said Walter Hackett, an
attorney who represents homeowners in the Golden State.

document may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not have been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Tenants Together is making this
article available on our website in an effort to advance the understanding of
tenant rights issues in California. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair
use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the
U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes
of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Help build power for renters' rights: